2,228
edits
Welcome to Sprocket School! This project is maintained by volunteer editors. Learn more about how this works. |
No edit summary |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===Rules of thumb=== | ===Rules of thumb=== | ||
* The big one: Soft-matted widescreen is easily mistaken for full-frame 1.37 - don't be fooled! | * The big one: Soft-matted widescreen is easily mistaken for full-frame 1.37 - don't be fooled! | ||
* Also don't doubt your eyes. The best test of an aspect ratio theory is how it looks on screen (or, in a pinch, on the bench). Test a reel while switching up on aperture plates & lenses. The opening credits and title card are often the best frames to eyeball. | |||
* Films originally released for TV exhibition or on 16mm are more likely than others to be natively 1.37 | * Films originally released for TV exhibition or on 16mm are more likely than others to be natively 1.37 | ||
* With very few exceptions, Hollywood films made after 1953 are intended to be projected in widescreen aspect ratios | |||
* With very few exceptions, Japanese films made before the late 1970s are either 1.37 or 'scope | * With very few exceptions, Japanese films made before the late 1970s are either 1.37 or 'scope | ||
===Note on films from the 1950s=== | ===Note on American films from the 1950s=== | ||
Some films made in the late 1950s, after the rise of widescreen, can be played in either 1.37 or widescreen without suffering. In | Some American films made in the late 1950s, after the rise of widescreen, can be played in either 1.37 or widescreen without suffering. In most cases there is an obvious correct choice. | ||
Nonetheless, there is much lively debate among cinephiles about the "correct" aspect ratio of many films from this period. We recommend that projectionists steer clear of these discussions! Instead, focus on the print in front of you (especially any references to aspect ratio written on or printed into the leader) and on primary sources (such as interviews with the filmmaker or historical promotions material). | |||
==List of films== | ==List of films== | ||
Line 109: | Line 106: | ||
* David Bordwell: "[http://www.davidbordwell.net/blog/2007/12/14/godard-comes-in-many-shapes-and-sizes/ Godard comes in many shapes and sizes]" (2007, University of Wisconsin-Madison) | * David Bordwell: "[http://www.davidbordwell.net/blog/2007/12/14/godard-comes-in-many-shapes-and-sizes/ Godard comes in many shapes and sizes]" (2007, University of Wisconsin-Madison) | ||
* Joe Beres: "[http://blogs.walkerart.org/filmvideo/2008/03/20/paranoid-parks-aspect-ratio/ Paranoid Park’s aspect ratio conundrum]" (2008, Walker Art Center) | * Joe Beres: "[http://blogs.walkerart.org/filmvideo/2008/03/20/paranoid-parks-aspect-ratio/ Paranoid Park’s aspect ratio conundrum]" (2008, Walker Art Center) | ||
* Kyle Westphal: "[http://www.northwestchicagofilmsociety.org/2012/07/02/invasion-of-the-aspect-ratios/ Invasion of the | * Bob Furmanek: "[http://www.3dfilmarchive.com/home/widescreen-documentation The New Era of Screen Dimensions]" and "[http://www.3dfilmarchive.com/the-first-year-of-widescreen The First Year of Widescreen Production]" | ||
* Kyle Westphal: "[http://www.northwestchicagofilmsociety.org/2012/07/02/invasion-of-the-aspect-ratios/ Invasion of the aspect ratios]" (2012, Northwest Chicago Film Society) | |||
[[Category:Resources]] | [[Category:Resources]] | ||
[[Category:Film prints]] | [[Category:Film prints]] | ||
[[Category:Showmanship]] | [[Category:Showmanship]] |